Cylindrical Coordinates and the jacobian

Hi everyone,

I have a question about the tutorial discussing the thermal conduction of a rod with a circular section.

In the tutorial, they get the equation in the strong form and then implement it into FreeFem and show the code. However, I noticed that they do not include the jacobian r*dr in their weak form.

I am simulating a problem similar to that, although without the time dependence. I am confused why the integral does not include that r term.


Hi Kevin,

I think the Jacobian is included in this example (the factor “*x”)
If this can be of any help, below I put another example (for spherical coordinates)

/*   Coordinate dependant differential operators  */
/* Spherical coordinates in the (r,theta) plane   */
/*                                                */
/*   r     --> x  in [0,infty]                    */
/*   theta --> y  in [0,pi]                       */
/*   phi   --> not                                */
/*                                                */
/*    Jacobian determinant                        */
/*    The det(J) = r^2*sin(theta) --> x^2*sin(y)  */
macro Jac()(x^2*sin(y) )  // /*                   */
/* The gradient operator in spherical coordinates */
/*                                                */
/*            d/dr                                */
/*   grad =   1/r*d/dtheta                        */
/*            1/(r*sin(theta))*d/dphi             */
/*                                                */
  macro Grad(u) [dx(u),dy(u)/x]	    // /*         */
  macro Lap(u,v) (Grad(u)'*Grad(v)) // /*     ')  */
 macro Source()(exp(-x^2)*(6-4*x^2) )  //

Vh u,v;
problem Poisson(u,v) = int2d(Th)( Jac*Lap(u,v) )
+on(1,u=0)  ;


I’ll put also some brief notes I had some time ago, if this can be of any help.
It is for kind of Laplace-Beltrami operator…Here I use the conventions from
field theory/general relativity (raising indices with the metric)

Let me know if this makes sense to you.
Hope this helps,

1 Like

Thank you Julien.

That does help, though I think your last screenshot is over my head a bit.

And I realize sheepishly that it does include the Jacobian now that I went through it again.

I think my confusion stems from the fact that I am trying to run FEM simulations in a sort of weird coordinate system with an equation that I believe is correct. But I am getting strange results that are unphysical when I try to switch from a problem involving cartesian coordinates plus an extra one to one involving polar coordinates plus an extra one, and so I thought maybe the error came from there.
Which I mention here.

Anyway. Thanks Again!